Vladimir Putin’s Goal: Returning Russia To 19th Century Prominence

RT News

RT News

Tip of the hat to Henry who lives in a country in Europe that suffered greatly at the hands of a former empire. At times he gives me a European perspective on matters. He referred me to this site.

It is an article written by Timothy Garton Ash a professor at Oxford who met Putin back in 1994 when Putin was deputy mayor of St. Petersburg, Russia. He described him as: a short, thickset man with a rather ratlike face.”  

He tells how Putin said Russia:had voluntarily given up “huge territories” to the former republics of the Soviet Union, including areas “which historically have always belonged to Russia.

Putin went on to say:“Russia could not simply abandon to their fate those “25 million Russians” who now lived abroad. The world had to respect the interests of the Russian state “and of the Russian people as a great nation.”

(2) A PutinProfessor Ash said at that time it was impossible to imagine Putin rising to become “the uncrowned czar of all Russia” and pushing his 19th-century völkisch vision as the policy of a 21st-century state.”  He went on to say: “Today’s Kremlin has its own perverted version of the Western-developed and United Nations-sanctified humanitarian doctrine of the “responsibility to protect.” Russia, Mr. Putin insists, has a responsibility to protect all Russians abroad, and he gets to decide who is a Russian.”

Professor Ash went on to explain how Putin tried various means of dealing with the West which he found unsatisfactory despite the West’s accommodations before he returned to his: “resentment-fueled protector state doctrine . . . already there in 1994.”

He suggests the actions of Putin are “a threat not just to Russia’s Eastern European and Eurasian neighbors but to the whole post-1945 international order. Across the world, countries see men and women living in other countries whom they regard as in some sense “their people,”” noting in particular China concern for its citizens in Southeast Asia.

He called Putin’s statements in regard to the MH17 disaster: hypocrisy on an Orwellian scale for Mr. Putin to maintain, as he did on Friday, that “the government over whose territory this happened bears the responsibility for this terrible tragedy.””

(1) putin and merkelHe ended by saying about the downing of the Malaysian airline: “It is precisely the ambiguous mixtures created by Mr. Putin’s völkisch version of the “responsibility to protect” that produce such disastrous possibilities. He subverts and calls into question the authority of the government of a sovereign territory, and then blames it for the result. So if an obscure deputy mayor starts sounding off in alarming terms at some conference you are attending, my advice is, Wake up. Of course, most such ranters do not rise to the top. But when they do, their ideologies of resentment may be written out in blood.” (my emphasis)

The article is well worth your time if you are confused about the motives and actions of Putin. I only hope Obama and Chancellor Merkel have a chance to read it.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Vladimir Putin’s Goal: Returning Russia To 19th Century Prominence

  1. GOK says:

    “The article is well worth your time if you are confused about the motives and actions of Putin. I only hope Obama and Chancellor Merkel have a chance to read it.”

    To me, Obama is so mentally absent from (or so willfully negligent toward) his official position as Commander-in-Chief that he actually ***isn’t even in position*** to be confused about this. In a sense, Obama’s the starting quarterback who’s taking the Fall semester off.

  2. Henry Barth says:

    Another comment — by an American politician — you won’t see in the Boston Globe:

    This weak and timid President talks big… and does nothing: A devastating attack on Obama by a top Washington Insider.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2698685/This-weak-timid-President-talks-big-does-A-devastating-attack-Obama-Washington-insider.html

    • mtc9393 says:

      Henry:

      It has become abundantly clear that the man fears Putin. This is the time that the U.S.should be planning its moves but Obama is taking the weekend off in Camp David. It all points to an administration that has probably checked out for the next two and a half years. It may be an ugly time.

  3. NC says:

    Putin is too independent. He acts like George W Bush as a unilateralist. He should take more of a multi lateralist approach. Force him to become more like the rest of Europe. Give him the Nobel Prize and let him join the West’s club. All problems will be solved.

    • mtc9393 says:

      NC: Putin is pure evil. He cares little about the lives he took and is now covering up the evidence. The truck that lauched the missiles was seen going back over the border to Russia. They tried to let him into the West’s club changing the G – 7 to the G – 8 but he couldn’t behave like a norman individual so they threw him out.

  4. NC says:

    A renowned military expert from Brighton was asked if the West could defeat Russia in a military conflict on the Russian-Ukraine border. He said no and there is one word to describe the reason LOGISTICS. Hope the Ukrainians don’t stumble into certain defeat. The US is giving the same advice to the Ukraine that Churchill gave to the Aussies just before Gallipoli.

    • mtc9393 says:

      NC:

      The West can defeat Russia economically. No one is talking of going to war with it in a military fashion. You seem to overlook that it is Russia that has and is invading Ukraine; your recipe is that Ukraine should do nothing about it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>